Video Resumes Raise New Legal Concerns
- By Your mom
- •
- 01 Jul, 2007
Video resumes are becoming more popular, especially among younger workers. In some
cases a video resume is used in place of a paper version, while in others it is supplemental. A
recent survey conducted by Vault Inc., a company providing online career information, found
that a majority of employers would view video resumes as part of its hiring decision.
Specifically, they stated a video would provide a better sense of the candidate’s experience, and
permit them to gauge a person’s speaking ability, leadership, poise, eye contact, and charisma.
While providing these benefits, employers must also be conscious of the legal
ramifications surrounding video resumes. Traditionally, employers review paper resumes or
applications, decide who is minimally qualified, and invite those who are for interviews. Videos
permit an employer to know an applicant’s race, color, gender and visible disabilities prior to, or
simultaneous with, evaluating their skills and experience. This can lead to claims of
discrimination where a candidate shows they did not advance to the interview stage when others
of similar qualifications did. Further, companies favoring video resumes may run afoul of the
law if their procedures screen out less affluent candidates of color who may not be able to afford
the cost of developing a video resume.
While the EEOC has stated that video resumes are not unlawful per se, it has reminded
employers that any employment practice that screens out a disproportionate number of
candidates of color could trigger a disparate impact claim.
Even with these risks, advances in technology and increasing numbers of younger
applicants suggest that video resumes will increase over time. As long as employers take
appropriate steps to ensure their procedures do not adversely screen out any group of candidates
the benefits from videos may outweigh the elevated risks of using them.
cases a video resume is used in place of a paper version, while in others it is supplemental. A
recent survey conducted by Vault Inc., a company providing online career information, found
that a majority of employers would view video resumes as part of its hiring decision.
Specifically, they stated a video would provide a better sense of the candidate’s experience, and
permit them to gauge a person’s speaking ability, leadership, poise, eye contact, and charisma.
While providing these benefits, employers must also be conscious of the legal
ramifications surrounding video resumes. Traditionally, employers review paper resumes or
applications, decide who is minimally qualified, and invite those who are for interviews. Videos
permit an employer to know an applicant’s race, color, gender and visible disabilities prior to, or
simultaneous with, evaluating their skills and experience. This can lead to claims of
discrimination where a candidate shows they did not advance to the interview stage when others
of similar qualifications did. Further, companies favoring video resumes may run afoul of the
law if their procedures screen out less affluent candidates of color who may not be able to afford
the cost of developing a video resume.
While the EEOC has stated that video resumes are not unlawful per se, it has reminded
employers that any employment practice that screens out a disproportionate number of
candidates of color could trigger a disparate impact claim.
Even with these risks, advances in technology and increasing numbers of younger
applicants suggest that video resumes will increase over time. As long as employers take
appropriate steps to ensure their procedures do not adversely screen out any group of candidates
the benefits from videos may outweigh the elevated risks of using them.